Asset managers often wish to find the portfolio with the highest risk-adjusted return, as it can leveraged (or de-leveraged) to obtain superior returns compared to any other portfolio.
I showed in link how to find this portfolio by solving a portfolio optimization problem for different risk aversion coefficients.
This post describes how to find the optimal tangency portfolio in a faster way than previously shown.
Instead of solving the portfolio optimization model over and over for different risk averision coefficients to find the portfolio with the highest risk-adjusted return, we can actually find the optimal portfolio in one step. This can be done using a technique called fractional programming.
The method works by mapping the problem into another space and introducing an auxiliary variable . However, certain requirements need to be satisfied before using this approach. We need two objectives, where one seeks to maximize a concave function and another - to miminize a convex function.
This is the case for portfolio optimization where we maximize returns (concave) and minimize risk (convex).
If we use the mean-CVaR, we can write the fractional formulation of the model as
where is the fraction to be invested in each asset, and and is the expected return of each asset and a benchmark, respectively. is the Value at Risk, is an auxilirary variable, and is the scenarios.
If we use the efficient frontier and compute the optimal fractional portfolio with a benchmark of 0% return, we can observe that that it lies very much to the left on the risk scale. The portfolio consists of 82% bonds, 15% S&P500 and 3% Small Cap, so it is a very risk-averse portfolio.
Historically, this portfolio has performed like this.
Now, if we instead define the benchmark as the 1/N portfolio, which equally weights the different assets, then the historical performance looks like this.
Here, the portfolio consist of 80% S&P 500, 13% Emerging Market and 7% in global Large Cap, excluding the US and Canada.
The benchmark in the model can be seen as a return requirement, and the optimal portfolio is a portfolio which is most likely to outperform it. In this way, the fractional mean-CVaR model can actually be considered as a form of enhanced index tracking, where we seek to construct a model which tracks some index (the benchmark), but also seeks to outperform it.
So far, we have not introduced the leverage into the model. The first portfolio has much higher risk-adjusted returns than the second one, which means that it can be leveraged to deliver superior returns with the same amount of risk, assuming that it is free to borrow money.
We need to leverage the first portfolio approximately 4x to obtain the same amount of risk as the second one.
If we construct an insample horse race between the two strategies where the strategies has equal risk, we get the following
It can be observed that we can greatly outperform the stock heavy portfolio using a very low risk bond heavy portfolio when applying leverage. This is assuming that we don’t have to pay for our financing. In reality, leverage is not free but when applied under the right curcumstances can lead to enhanced absolute and risk adjusted returns.